Importance and effectiveness of graphotechnical expertise in the identification and accreditation of document falsifications, San Martín-Peru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51252/rcri.v5i1.776Keywords:
authenticity, copy documents, forgery, jurisprudence, expertAbstract
The study focused on analyzing the importance and effectiveness of graphotechnical expert reports conducted by the Forensic Graphotechnics and Criminalistics Unit of the Peruvian National Police in the departments of San Martín and Loreto (Yurimaguas). This unit specializes in determining the authenticity or falsity of documents, signatures, and handwriting, playing a key role in resolving crimes related to document forgery. Graphotechnical expert reports not only complement the judicial process but also serve as a fundamental element, supported by the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court, the Constitutional Court, and comparative law, which emphasize their 100% critical importance. During the study period (2021–2022), an effectiveness rate of 73% in 2021 and 72% in 2022 was achieved, demonstrating consistent performance. A total of 126 cases were resolved, analyzing 1,120 samples through 160 expert reports, highlighting the reliability of the process.
Downloads
References
Arı, B., Ucuz, İ., Arı, A., Özdemir, F., & Sengur, A. (2020). Grafik Tablet Kullanılarak Makine Öğrenmesi Yardımı ile El Yazısından Cinsiyet Tespiti. Fırat Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 32(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.35234/fumbd.659610
Babuscia, A., & Cheung, K.-M. (2014). An approach to perform expert elicitation for engineering design risk analysis: Methodology and experimental results. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), 177(2), 475-497.
Barney Smith, E., & Pal, U. (2021). Document Analysis and Recognition – ICDAR 2021 Workshops Lausanne, Switzerland, September 5–10, 2021, Proceedings, Part II: Lausanne, Switzerland, September 5–10, 2021, Proceedings, Part II. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86159-9
Beck, L., Caffy, I., Mussard, S., Delqué-Količ, E., Moreau, C., Sieudat, M., Dumoulin, J.-P., Perron, M., Thellier, B., Hain, S., Foy, E., Moulherat, C., & Ocbc. (2022). Detecting recent forgeries of Impressionist and Pointillist paintings with high-precision radiocarbon dating. Forensic Science International, 333, 111214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111214
Bourne, L. E., Kole, J. A., & Healy, A. F. (2014). Expertise: Defined, described, explained. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 186. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00186
Caligiuri, M. P., Kim, C., & Landy, K. M. (2014). Kinematics of Signature Writing in Healthy Aging. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 59(4), 1020-1024. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12437
Carlessi, S., & Meza, R. (2015). Metodología y Diseños en la Investigación Científica. Metodología y Diseños en la Investigación Científica 5ta. Edición. https://www.academia.edu/78002369/METODOLOG%C3%8DA_Y_DISE%C3%91OS_EN_LA_INVESTIGACI%C3%93N_CIENT%C3%8DFICA
Carrillo, A. S. M. (2015). El dolo: ¿fenómeno espiritual o atribución normativa? THEMIS Revista de Derecho, 68, 61-76.
Casación 258-2015-ICA.pdf.
Casación 333-2015-LIMA.pdf.
Casación1121-2016-PUNO.pdf.
Çatalçam, B., & Alıcı, O. V. (2023). Kamu Görevlisi Tarafından İşlenen Resmî Belgede Sahtecilik Suçuna İlişkin Adli ve İdari Yargı Kararlarının Mukayeseli Analizi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.59399/cuhad.1229082
Ci̇N, M. O. (2021). Ceza Yargılamasında Bilirkişilik ve Uygulama Sorunları. Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi, Necmettin Erbakan University, 1(4), 170-184. https://doi.org/10.51120/NEUHFD.2021.14
Cobo del Rosal, M. (1995). Esquema de una teoría general de los delitos de falsedad. Cuadernos de política criminal, 56, 429-446.
Creus, C., & Buompadre, J. (2004). La falsificación de documentos en general. https://biblioteca.mpf.gov.ar/meran/opac-detail.pl?id1=2760
D.S. N°033-2018-PCM. (2024, agosto 23). Contacto digital del Estado Peruano: Falsedad ideológica, genérica y otros delitos. https://www.gob.pe/34581-falsedad-ideologica-generica-y-otros-delitos
Galvano, F., Caporale, M., & Siliquini, C. (2023). Graphology in Forensic Contexts Unveiling Personality and Behavior through Handwriting Analysis. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25537.33125
Genç Sütlü, Ö., Şen Yılmaz, A., & Aşıcıoğlu, F. (2022). Examination of Time Dependent Variations in Signatures. https://avesis.iuc.edu.tr/yayin/c64ba970-528a-449f-8bce-4fdbc634e466/examination-of-time-dependent-variations-in-signatures
Grilo, G. F., Pereira, C., & Felipetto, D. (2021). Análise de conceitos teóricos e práticos acerca da grafoscopia. Revista Terra & Cultura: Cadernos de Ensino e Pesquisa, 36(71), 96-108.
Gutiérrez Avendaño, J. (2011). La escritura de la ciencia en cuatro conceptos: Código, género, epistemografía y paradigma. Katharsis, 11.
Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. McGraw Hill España. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=775008
Junior, C. A. M. L., Henrique Marques da Silva, M., Leite Dantas Bezerra, B., José Torres Fernandes, B., & Impedovo, D. (2020). FCN+RL: A Fully Convolutional Network followed by Refinement Layers to Offline Handwritten Signature Segmentation. 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN48605.2020.9206594
Kahraman, R. (2020). Belgede Sahtecilik Suçlarında İğfal Kabiliyeti. Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, 26(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.33433/maruhad.807478
Linden, J., & Marquis, R. (2023). The influence of time on dynamic signature: An exploratory data analysis. Forensic Science International, 348, 111577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111577
Lu, J., Qi, H., Wu, X., Zhang, C., & Tang, Q. (2022). Research on Authentic Signature Identification Method Integrating Dynamic and Static Features. Applied Sciences, 12(19), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199904
Melo, A. P. C. de, Bezerra, B. L. D., Lopes Júnior, C. A. M., Lima, F. G. A., Lucena, L. V. de O., Stodolni, M. C., Meneses, D. C., & Advíncula, K. P. (2021). Analysis of the main criteria used in expert handwriting analysis of signatures. Revista CEFAC, 23, e1721. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20212351721
Menéndez, E. J. M. (2023). Relevancia de los peritajes técnicos científicos aportados por el Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Forenses de Guatemala -INACIF- en un proceso penal por delito cometido en contra de la indemnidad sexual de una persona menor de edad. Revista Científica Diálogo forense, 3(6), Article 6. https://dialogoforense.inacif.gob.gt/index.php/dialogoforense/article/view/72
Miric, F., & Arandelovic, D. R. (2020). Examen forense de firmas y escritura a mano: Enfoque multidisciplinario. Facta Universitatis, Serie: Derecho y política, 18, 207.
Pariona Arana, R. (2022). El bien jurídico en el delito de colusión. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12640/3295
Piva Torres, G. E. (2024). Concepción psicológica del dolo. vLex. https://vlex.es/vid/concepcion-psicologica-dolo-844777661
Policía Nacional del Perú. (2013). RD No 247-2013-DIRGEN/EMG Manual de procedimientos periciales de criminalistica—Policia Nacional del Perú. https://www.policia.gob.pe/Contenido/doc/docuDireasjur/MANUAL%20DE%20PROCEDIMIENTOS%20%20PERICIALES%20CRIMINALISITICA-2012.pdf
Preti, A. N., Diana, L., Castaldo, R., Pischedda, F., Difonzo, T., Fumagalli, G., Arighi, A., Sartori, G., Zago, S., & Bolognini, N. (2023). Does cognitive decline influence signing? Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 35(11), 2685-2691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-023-02523-7
Recurso de nulidad N° 177-2023-CALLAO.pdf.
Recurso de nulidad N°1851-2018-LIMA.pdf.
Resolución de nulidad N°676-2018-DEL SANTA.pdf.
SAP-M N°8070-2017-España.pdf.
SAP-MU N°2973-2022-España.pdf.
SAP-SA N°290-2019-España.pdf.
Shevchukova, S. L. C. (2023). La prueba grafotécnica: Fundamentos, validez y fiabilidad. Quaestio facti. Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio, 4, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i1.22841
STC Exp. N°00336-2012-PHC-TC.pdf.
STC exp. N°03742-2007-HC-TC, R. P. (s. f.). STC exp. N°03742-2007-HC-TC.
STC N°03742-2007-PHC/TC. (2009, enero 7). EXP. N.° 03742-2007-PHC/TC. Scribd. https://es.scribd.com/document/317906529/03742-2007-HC-Resolucion
Willingham, E. (2022, agosto 2). Forensic Experts Are Surprisingly Good at Telling whether Two Writing Samples Match. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/forensic-experts-are-surprisingly-good-at-telling-whether-two-writing-samples-match/
Yuliza, E., Amalia, N., Rahmayanti, H. D., Munir, M. M., Khairurrijal, K., & Abdullah, M. (2021). How human age affects the signature’s curvature, density and amplitude to wavelength ratio and its potential application for countering document falsification. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 53(1), 112-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2019.1664633
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Karina Milagros Ordóñez-Ruiz, Estefany Magali Flores-Vargas, Pat Jaffet Saavedra-Perez, Luis Alberto Ordóñez-Sánchez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their rights:
a. The authors retain their trademark and patent rights, as well as any process or procedure described in the article.
b. The authors retain the right to share, copy, distribute, execute and publicly communicate the article published in the Ratio Iure Scientific Journal (RCRI) (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in the RCRI.
c. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their works, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), provided that they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
