Comparative effectiveness of natural stracts based on western soapberry (Sapindus saponaria) and Neem (Azadirachta indica) on ticks at the laboratory level
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51252/revza.v4i2.670Keywords:
alternative, antiparasitic, pollution, natural treatmentAbstract
The use of medicinal plants as antiparasitic is an alternative that does not cause harm to the animal or the environment. The objective was to measure the effect of two plants Sapindus saponari (choloque) and Azadirachta indica (neem) at concentrations of 50 ppm, 500 ppm and 5 000 ppm, measured in one hour, at 15-minute intervals. A completely randomized block design was used for the experimental design, where the evaluation value for the model was less than 0.05 (p-value=7.26e07). The results obtained highlight the effect of neem from low concentrations of 50 ppm, with which a mortality rate of 15% was obtained, and at concentrations of 5,000 ppm a mortality rate of 40% was obtained. When evaluating the effect of choloque, it began to act at concentrations of 5,000 ppm with a mortality rate of 15%. The mortality rate was measured up to 60 minutes, during which time neem at a concentration of 5 000 ppm reached a mortality rate of 85% and choloque at the same concentration reached a mortality rate of 60%. In all measurements the Anova was significant for the different treatments.
Downloads
References
Borges LMF, Sousa LAD de, Barbosa C da S. Perspectives for the use of plant extracts to control the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Rev Bras Parasitol Veterinária. junio de 2011;20(2):89-96. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612011000200001
Graf JF, Gogolewski R, Leach-Bing N, Sabatini GA, Molento MB, Bordin EL, et al. Tick control: an industry point of view. Parasitology. 19 de octubre de 2004;129(S1):S427-42. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182004006079
Jonsson NN. The productivity effects of cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) infestation on cattle, with particular reference to Bos indicus cattle and their crosses. Vet Parasitol [Internet]. abril de 2006;137(1-2):1-10. Disponible en: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0304401706000276
Bianchin I, Catto JB, Kichel AN, Torres RAA, Honer MR. The effect of the control of endo- and ectoparasites on weight gains in crossbred cattle (Bos taurus taurus × Bos taurus indicus) in the central region of Brazil. Trop Anim Health Prod. 26 de julio de 2007;39(4):287-96. Diponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-007-9017-1
Jongejan F, Uilenberg G. The global importance of ticks. Parasitology. 19 de octubre de 2004;129(S1):S3-14. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182004005967
Chanie M, Negash T, Sirak A. Ectoparasites are the major causes of various types of skin lesions in small ruminants in Ethiopia. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1 de agosto de 2010;42(6):1103-9. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-010-9531-4
Johnson N. The tick life cycle. En: Ticks. Elsevier; 2023. p. 25-44. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91148-1.00005-8
Grillo Torrado JM. El problema de la resistencia a los Acaricidas en los programmas de control de la garrapata. Boletín la Of Sanit Panam [Internet]. 1976;81(3):1-6. Disponible en: https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/17535
United States. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Ticks of Veterinary Importance. 1.a ed. 1976. 122 p.
Cardona Z. E, Torres R. F, Echeverri L. F. Evaluación in vitro de los extractos crudos de sapindus saponaria sobre hembras ingurgitadas de boophilus microplus (acari: ixodidae). Sci Tech [Internet]. 2007;13(33):51-4. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=84903312
R-Studio. Programa estadístico R studio. 2023; Disponible en: https://www.r-studio.com/es/
Dimas Pajuelo P. Evaluación in vitro de los extractos crudos de Sapindus saponaria sobre huevos y larvas Boophilus microplus [Internet]. Universidad Nacional Agraria de la Selva; 2012. Disponible en: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14292/778
García Montes Y, Castro García M, López Mantuano M, Cardenas Reyes E, Molina Basurto R. Efecto del Extracto de Hoja de Neem (Azadirachta indica) Para Control de Ectoparásitos en Perros. Rev Científica [Internet]. 2017;27(3). Disponible en: http://www.saber.ula.ve/handle/123456789/43724
Drummond RO, Ernst SE, Trevino JL, Gladney WJ, Graham OH. Boophilus annulatus and B. microplus: Laboratory Tests of Insecticides. J Econ Entomol. 1 de febrero de 1973;66(1):130-3. . Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/66.1.130
Bocayuva Tavares GD, Fortes Aiub CA, Felzenszwalb I, Carrão Dantas EK, Araújo-Lima CF, Siqueira Júnior CL. In vitro biochemical characterization and genotoxicity assessment of Sapindus saponaria seed extract. J Ethnopharmacol. agosto de 2021;276:114170. . Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2021.114170
Vegas MM. Efectividad del sapindus saponaria en el control de garrapatas boophilus microplus en ganado bovino. Red Investig Educ [Internet]. 2017;9(2):18-27. Disponible en: https://revistas.uclave.org/index.php/redine/article/view/749
Fernandes FF, Leles RN, Silva IG, Freitas EPS. Larvicidal potencial of Sapindus saponaria (Sapindaceae) against Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille, 1806) (Acari: Ixodidae). Arq Bras Med Veterinária e Zootec. febrero de 2007;59(1):145-9. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352007000100024
Soto Mérida AL. Comparación del efecto ixodicida in vitro de diferentes concentraciones de aceite de NEEM (Azadirachta indica) sobre garrapatas Boophilus sp. de bovino [Internet]. Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala; 2014. Disponible en: https://catalogosiidca.csuca.org/Record/USAC.587615
Fernández, A, I., Ilsen Emérita, D., Rodríguez, R., José, A., & Paz H. Actividad garrapaticida de Azadirachta indica A. Juss. (nim). Rev Cuba Plantas Med [Internet]. 2013;18(2):327-40. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=41097
Nolasco Rodríguez G, Albarrán Rodríguez E, Rosales Cortés M. Efecto del extracto acuoso de Neem (Azadirachta indica) en el control de garrapatas (Rhipicephalus sanguineus) en perros. ECUCBA [Internet]. 2018;(9):1-8. Disponible en: http://e-cucba.cucba.udg.mx/index.php/e-Cucba/article/view/95
Ghosh S, Tiwari SS, Srivastava S, Sharma AK, Kumar S, Ray DD, et al. Acaricidal properties of Ricinus communis leaf extracts against organophosphate and pyrethroids resistant Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Vet Parasitol. febrero de 2013;192(1-3):259-67. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.09.031
Kemp DH, Bourne A. Boophilus microplus : the effect of histamine on the attachment of cattle-tick larvae–studies in vivo and in vitro. Parasitology. 6 de junio de 1980;80(3):487-96. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182000000950
Ibelli AMG, Ribeiro ARB, Giglioti R, Regitano LCA, Alencar MM, Chagas ACS, et al. Resistance of cattle of various genetic groups to the tick Rhipicephalus microplus and the relationship with coat traits. Vet Parasitol. mayo de 2012;186(3-4):425-30. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.11.019
Piper EK, Jackson LA, Bielefeldt-Ohmann H, Gondro C, Lew-Tabor AE, Jonsson NN. Tick-susceptible Bos taurus cattle display an increased cellular response at the site of larval Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus attachment, compared with tick-resistant Bos indicus cattle. Int J Parasitol. marzo de 2010;40(4):431-41. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.09.009
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tito Robin Saavedra-Tomanguillo, Alicia María López-Flores
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their rights:
a. The authors retain their trademark and patent rights, as well as any process or procedure described in the article.
b. The authors retain the right to share, copy, distribute, execute and publicly communicate the article published in the Revista de Veterinaria y Zootecnia Amazónica (REVZA) (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in the REVZA.
c. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their works, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), provided that they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
