Últimas tendencias de investigación en investigación de código abierto

Sergio La-Cruz-Orbe; Santiago Ernesto Ramos-y-Yovera; Fiorella Victoria Luperdi-Ríos; Abrahán César Neri-Ayala

doi:10.51252/rcsi.v5i1.911

Autores/as

Sergio La-Cruz-Orbe Universidad Nacional José Faustino Sánchez Carrión https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1034-3157
Santiago Ernesto Ramos-y-Yovera Universidad Nacional José Faustino Sánchez Carrión
Fiorella Victoria Luperdi-Ríos Universidad Nacional José Faustino Sánchez Carrión
Abrahán César Neri-Ayala Universidad José Faustino Sánchez Carrión

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51252/rcsi.v5i1.911

Palabras clave:

código abierto, sistemas abiertos, análisis bibliométrico, tendencias de investigación

Resumen

Analizamos las últimas tendencias en investigación sobre código abierto desde el 2020 hasta el 2024. Utilizamos técnicas bibliométricas como productividad y colaboración de autores, productividad y colaboración institucional, y coocurrencia de términos. Se empleó Scopus para recopilar la muestra analizada. En cuanto a la productividad por autores, los que más destacan han superado el umbral de nueve artículos en los últimos cinco años. Entre las organizaciones, las más productivas son la University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (China), la Carnegie Mellon University (Estados Unidos), la Zhejiang University (China), el Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT, Estados Unidos) y la Stanford University (Estados Unidos). El análisis de palabras asociadas reveló cinco grupos temáticos: software de código abierto e inteligencia artificial, investigación médica y metodologías científicas, revisiones sistemáticas y estudios de impacto en la salud, simulación, física cuántica y sistemas complejos, e investigación médica y demográfica.

Citas

Aksulu, A., & Wade, M. R. (2010). A comprehensive review and synthesis of open source research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 11(11), 6. 576-656. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00245

Ausejo Sánchez, J. L., Soto, F. G. C., Rosa, P. E. R. L., Palma, D. F. M., Campos, G. A. C., & Cadillo, A. J. R. (2024). Big data research in the business, management and accounting field: Revealing the thematic structure based on co-word analysis. Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.116

Ayala, A. C. N., Valenzuela Narváez, D. A. O., Manes Cangana, G. A., Orbe, S. L. C., Torres Anaya, A. J., & Ayala Huaynatte, E. (2024). Blended learning research: Identifying research output patterns in Scopus (2000-2023). Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication, 4(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.124.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.124.4

Bansal, J., & Bansal, M. (2021). Open Source Software (OSS): A Scientometric Study of Global Publications during 1999-18. Journal of Indian Library Association, 56(2), 84-92. https://www.ilaindia.net/jila/index.php/jila/article/view/707

Duarte, L., & Teodoro, A. C. (2021). GIS open-source plugins development: A 10-year bibliometric analysis on scientific literature. Geomatics, 1(2), 206-245. https://doi.org/10.3390/geomatics1020013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/geomatics1020013

Evangelatos, N., Satyamourthy, K., Levidou, G., Brand, H., Bauer, P., Kouskouti, C., & Brand, A. (2018). Use of free/libre open source software in sepsis “-omics” research: A bibliometric, comparative analysis among the United States, EU-28 Member States, and China. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, 22(5), 365-372. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2018.0032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2018.0032

Kanwal, P. (2017). A Bibliometric Study of World Research Output on Free and Open Source Software Literature during 1960-2016. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 8(3), 1067-1072. https://doi.org/10.26483/ijarcs.v8i3.3157

Khode, S., & Thakkar, S. (2012). Bibliometric analysis of literature published in emerald journals on open source. Gyankosh-The Journal of Library and Information Management, 3(2), 49-54.

Murray, D., McDermott, Y., & Koenig, K. A. (2022). Mapping the use of open source research in UN Human Rights investigations. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 14(2), 554-581. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huab059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huab059

Newby, G. B., Greenberg, J., & Jones, P. (2003). Open source software development and Lotka's law: bibliometric patterns in programming. Journal of the American Society for information science and technology, 54(2), 169-178. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10177

Patralekh, M., Vaishya, R., & Vaish, A. (2024). Impact of COVID-19 on Indian biomedical research: A bibliometric analysis using online data from 2017 to 2022. AWARI, 5, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.47909/awari.65 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47909/awari.65

Raasch, C., Lee, V., Spaeth, S., & Herstatt, C. (2013). The rise and fall of interdisciplinary research: The case of open source innovation. Research policy, 42(5), 1138-1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.01.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.01.010

Shang, R.; Zhang, B.; Ma, H.; & Zhang, T. (2022). Research Status, Hotspots and Trends of Open Source Intelligence Abroad. Journal of Modern Information, 42(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0821.2022.01.001

Silva, D. G., Coutinho, C., & Costa, C. J. (2024). Exploration of Open Source in Low-Income Countries: Review and Future Research Directions. In 2024 International Symposium on Sensing and Instrumentation in 5G and IoT Era (ISSI) (Vol. 1, pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSI63632.2024.10720490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSI63632.2024.10720490

Silva, D., Aparicio, M., & Costa, C. J. (2019,). Free and open source bibliometric study. In 2019 14th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI.2019.8760695 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI.2019.8760695

Toro, O. P., Correa, Y. A., Valencia-Arias, A., & Benjumea-Arias, M. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of the use of open source software in educational contexts. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.114

Velmurugan, C., & Radhakrishnan, N. (2016). Literature Research Trends and Authorship Pattern of Open Software Engineering Journal: a Scientometric Study. In A. Kishore et al (Eds.), Modern Trends in Library & Information Science in Digital Environment Festschrift Volume in Honour of Dr. U.M. Thakur (pp. 263 -274). Uttar Pradesh, India: University Prakashan.

Vizalote-Rodriguez, G. A. (2022). Contribución de las TI en la mejora de la productividad de las PYME. Revista Amazonía Digital, 1(1), e164. https://doi.org/10.55873/rad.v1i1.164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55873/rad.v1i1.164

Von Krogh, G., & Spaeth, S. (2007). The open source software phenomenon: Characteristics that promote research. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16(3), 236-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.06.001

Von Krogh, G., & Von Hippel, E. (2006). The promise of research on open source software. Management science, 52(7), 975-983. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0560 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0560

Zhao, R., & Wei, M. (2017). Impact evaluation of open source software: An altmetrics perspective. Scientometrics, 110, 1017-1033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2204-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2204-y