Effectiveness of the sanctions imposed for the prevention and control of the coronavirus in the District of Tarapoto
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51252/rcri.v1i1.123Keywords:
coronavirus, effectiveness, fine, infringement, state of emergencyAbstract
The present research has the general objective of knowing the effectiveness of the sanctions imposed for the prevention and control of the coronavirus, it is of a non-experimental type with a quantitative approach, a simple descriptive level, a simple descriptive Non-experimental research design, having people as population who failed to comply with the State of Emergency registered by the National Police of Peru of the District of Tarapoto, with the probabilistic sample of 275 people, having as instruments the checklist and the survey for those people who had violations of the Law, concluding that carried out The Spearman test shows that it accepts the hypothesis effectiveness of the sanctions imposed for the prevention and control of the coronavirus is low, answering the problem statement in the present investigation and where it is shown that the A01 code is not respecting the minimum of a mandatory distance of one meter, forming agglomerations in the establishments Commercial coughs whose opening is allowed was the most frequent with 46.91%.
Downloads
References
Alarcon Sotomayor, L. (2009). La Eficacia y la Ejecucion de las Sanciones de Tráfico. Revista de Documentacion Administrativa, 121 - 152.
Decreto Legislativo Nº 1458, Reglamento (Poder Ejectivo 15 de Abril de 2020).
Decreto Supremo, 064 - 2020 - PCM (Peru 10 de 04 de 2020).
Decreto Supremo, 063 - 2020 - PCM (Peru 09 de 04 de 2020).
Decreto Supremo, 061 - 2020 - PCM (Peru 06 de 04 de 2020).
Decreto Supremo, 058 - 2020 - PCM (Peru 02 de 04 de 2020).
Decreto Supremo, 053 - 2020 - PCM (Peru 30 de 03 de 2020).
Decreto Supremo, 051 - 2020 - PCM (Peru 27 de 03 de 2020).
Decreto Supremo, 046 - 2020 - PCM (Peru 18 de 03 de 2020).
Decreto Supremo, 045 - 2020 - PCM (Peru 17 de 03 de 2020).
Decreto Supremo, 044 - 2020 - PCM (Peru 15 de 03 de 2020).
García de Enterría, E., & Fernández, T. (1988). Curso de Derecho Administrativo Cuarta edición . Madrid, España: Civitas.
Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, M. d. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación. Mexico: McGraw-Hill / Interamericana Editores, S.A. DE C.V.
Lafuente, M. (1991). Sobre la Constitucionalizacion de la potestad de la administracion de Ejecucion Forzosa de sus actos . Madrid: Revista Poder Judicial.
Lozano, B. (1990). Panorama General de la Potestad Sancionadora de la Administracion de Europa . Madrid: RAP 121.
Martin-Retortillo Baquer, S. R. (1989). Reflexiones sobre la Ley de Disciplina e Intervencion Bancaria . Madrid: RAP.
TERREROS, F. V. (2018 ). Limites a la funcion punitiva estatal. Derecho & Sociedad , 93.
TORRICO, M. A. ( 2013). Sanciones penales en el Sistema Juridico Peruano. Revista Juridica Virtual, 2.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors retain their rights:
a. The authors retain their trademark and patent rights, as well as any process or procedure described in the article.
b. The authors retain the right to share, copy, distribute, execute and publicly communicate the article published in the Ratio Iure Scientific Journal (RCRI) (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in the RCRI.
c. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their works, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), provided that they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
