Pension 65 and its effectiveness in protecting the elderly in Peru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51252/rcri.v2i1.262Keywords:
constitution, estate, normative, forecastAbstract
The objective of the research was to analyze whether the pension regulations 65 are effective with respect to the protection of the elderly. A not experimental basic study was used; descriptive correlational explanatory level and quantitative approach. The study sample was applied to 67 professionals specializing in pension matters from the Lima Bar Association. It was hypothesized that the pension regulations 65 would not be effective with respect to the protection of the elderly, the same that was statistically verified in 54% of the specialists surveyed, the same ones who also propose that the regulations that regulate pension 65 should be unified by the State in a comprehensive pension system that allows its accessibility and support to all older adults, which should be a system financed by both the State and the workers, depending on the specific case. The results coincide with the specialists regarding the State protecting the elderly who are in a critical situation with a pension to finance their vital needs, in this way it will be complying with the constitutional mandate to watch over the lives of all Peruvian citizens.
Downloads
References
Avendaño Murillo, G. E. (2019). La desigualdad en la pensión de vejez frente a la constitución colombiana de 1991 [Universidad Libre]. https://hdl.handle.net/10901/15567
Constitución Política del Perú [Const]. Art. 4. 31 de diciembre de 1993 (Perú).
Decreto Supremo 081 [Presidencia del Consejo de Ministros]. Que crea el Programa Social denominado Programa Nacional de Asistencia Solidaria “Pensión 65”. 11 de octubre de 2011
Fernández, J. (2018). Pensión 65 y su validez y eficiencia como régimen de pensiones no contributivas en el Perú [Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/624023
Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6ta ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Medina Otazu, A. (2012). El Derecho de las personas mayores a gozar de pensiones no contributivas en el Perú [Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12672/1267
Ortiz, I., Durán-Valverde, F., Urban, S., Wodsak, V., & Yu, Z. (2018). Reversing pension privatization: Rebuilding public pension systems in Eastern European and Latin American countries (2000-18). Organización Internacional de Trabajo. https://www.ilo.org/secsoc/information-resources/publications-and-tools/Workingpapers/WCMS_648639/lang--en/index.htm
Rodríguez Moscoso, J. Z. (2018). El sistema de pilares múltiples: un sistema previsional alternativo para garantizar el derecho humano a la pensión en el Perú [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/13042
Tribunal Constitucional del Perú (2005). Fundamento Jurídico 54.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Víctor Asenjo-Castro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their rights:
a. The authors retain their trademark and patent rights, as well as any process or procedure described in the article.
b. The authors retain the right to share, copy, distribute, execute and publicly communicate the article published in the Ratio Iure Scientific Journal (RCRI) (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in the RCRI.
c. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their works, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), provided that they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
