Pension 65 and its effectiveness in protecting the elderly in Peru

Authors

  • Víctor Asenjo-Castro Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51252/rcri.v2i1.262

Keywords:

constitution, estate, normative, forecast

Abstract

The objective of the research was to analyze whether the pension regulations 65 are effective with respect to the protection of the elderly. A not experimental basic study was used; descriptive correlational explanatory level and quantitative approach. The study sample was applied to 67 professionals specializing in pension matters from the Lima Bar Association. It was hypothesized that the pension regulations 65 would not be effective with respect to the protection of the elderly, the same that was statistically verified in 54% of the specialists surveyed, the same ones who also propose that the regulations that regulate pension 65 should be unified by the State in a comprehensive pension system that allows its accessibility and support to all older adults, which should be a system financed by both the State and the workers, depending on the specific case. The results coincide with the specialists regarding the State protecting the elderly who are in a critical situation with a pension to finance their vital needs, in this way it will be complying with the constitutional mandate to watch over the lives of all Peruvian citizens.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Avendaño Murillo, G. E. (2019). La desigualdad en la pensión de vejez frente a la constitución colombiana de 1991 [Universidad Libre]. https://hdl.handle.net/10901/15567

Constitución Política del Perú [Const]. Art. 4. 31 de diciembre de 1993 (Perú).

Decreto Supremo 081 [Presidencia del Consejo de Ministros]. Que crea el Programa Social denominado Programa Nacional de Asistencia Solidaria “Pensión 65”. 11 de octubre de 2011

Fernández, J. (2018). Pensión 65 y su validez y eficiencia como régimen de pensiones no contributivas en el Perú [Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/624023

Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6ta ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Medina Otazu, A. (2012). El Derecho de las personas mayores a gozar de pensiones no contributivas en el Perú [Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12672/1267

Ortiz, I., Durán-Valverde, F., Urban, S., Wodsak, V., & Yu, Z. (2018). Reversing pension privatization: Rebuilding public pension systems in Eastern European and Latin American countries (2000-18). Organización Internacional de Trabajo. https://www.ilo.org/secsoc/information-resources/publications-and-tools/Workingpapers/WCMS_648639/lang--en/index.htm

Rodríguez Moscoso, J. Z. (2018). El sistema de pilares múltiples: un sistema previsional alternativo para garantizar el derecho humano a la pensión en el Perú [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/13042

Tribunal Constitucional del Perú (2005). Fundamento Jurídico 54.

Published

2022-01-20

How to Cite

Asenjo-Castro, V. (2022). Pension 65 and its effectiveness in protecting the elderly in Peru. Revista Científica Ratio Iure, 2(1), e262. https://doi.org/10.51252/rcri.v2i1.262