Semantic-syntactic indeterminacy in civil legal discourse

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51252/rcri.v3i2.545

Keywords:

Peruvian Civil Code, connectors, legal norm, civil discourse

Abstract

The close relationship between the semantic and syntactic elements of legal discourse implies the handling of a specific terminology, which, without being eminently lexical, is adequately combined with technolects, connectors and deontic operators for the full interpretation of its sense and meaning. so that ambiguities are avoided. In this perspective, the norms contained in books IV, V and VI of the Peruvian Civil Code have been analyzed. The analysis has been carried out based on norms of standard articles, in terms of structure and significance of the legal norm, which has made it easier to specify elements of semantic-syntactic indeterminacy that show ambiguities, incorrect use of punctuation marks and inappropriate use of connectors. "e" and "and". The most relevant conclusions reached are: the elements of semantic-syntactic indeterminacy in the Peruvian civil legal norm lead to the unilateral interpretation of the norm for its application, generating discrepancies in the light of jurisprudence and legal pragmatics and the relationship semantic-syntactic present in the legal norm implies the individual knowledge of the words, in terms of their sense and meaning of the discursive context in which it is used.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Decreto Legislativo N° 295. (23 de marzo de 2022). Artículo 934°. Propiedad. Biblioteca Nacional Del Perú, 24 de marzo de 2022. http://www.bnp.gob.pe/documents/marcolegal/codigo_civil_patrimonio_cultural_nacion.pdf

Fernández González, Á., & Hervás Salvador, B. V. (1977). Intruducción a la semántica (3rd ed.). IberLibro.

Iturralde, V. (1988). Elementos semánticos-sintácticos de determinación de los enunciados normativos en el lenguaje legal. Theoria, 7–8, 157–190. https://addi.ehu.es/bitstream/handle/10810/40018/Theoria7-9157-190.pdf?sequence=1

Martino, A. A. (1987). Sistemas Expertos Legales. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de La Ciencia, 3(1–2), 215–241. https://www.pdcnet.org/theoria/content/theoria_1987_0003_0001_0215_0241

Schmidt, S. (1973). Teoría del texto (15th ed.). Encyclopaedia Universalis

RCRI

Published

2023-07-10

How to Cite

Rubiños-Yzaguirre, H., & Santos-Cruz, T. J. (2023). Semantic-syntactic indeterminacy in civil legal discourse. Revista Científica Ratio Iure, 3(2), e545. https://doi.org/10.51252/rcri.v3i2.545

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.