Abuse of the administrative litigation process for the termination of the mining concession
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51252/rcri.v3i1.439Keywords:
abuse of the right, procedural abuse, mining concession, contentious-administrative processAbstract
The objective of this investigation was to study the abuse of the administrative contentious process due to the extinction of the mining concession in the Geological, Mining and Metallurgical Institute during the year 2019. For this, an investigation with a qualitative approach was chosen in which the grounded theory, hermeneutics and the case study to interpret the data obtained from interviews with specialists and judicial processes in contentious-administrative matters related to mining rights. Likewise, the information collected from the interviews was analyzed with the help of the qualitative data analysis software ATLAS.ti 9 and the data collected from the judicial processes using the Excel 2016 data analysis software. The results obtained demonstrated the existence of the abuse of the process, by the holders of the mining concessions, by resorting to the contentious-administrative process with the filing of lawsuits lacking foundations and with no expectation of success, in order to request the annulment of the administrative resolution that declared the extinction of the concession mining; as well as the nullity of the administrative resolution that declared the inadmissibility of the accreditation of the payment of the right of validity and/or penalty.
Downloads
References
Aguirrezabal Grünstein, M., & Pérez Ragone, Á. (2018). Aportes para una conducción colaborativa del proceso civil chileno: pensando una nueva justicia. Revista de Derecho Privado, 35, 293–326. https://doi.org/10.18601/01234366.n35.11
Antoraz, S. (2010). El abuso procesal y el principio de moralidad. Jurisprudencia Argentina, 13(Número Especial), 1–46. http://faeproc.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Jujuy_1.pdf
Cavero Safra, E. (2011). “Usted abusó” El Abuso de Procesos Legales frente a los derechos de acción y petición. Revista De Derecho Administrativo, 10, 259–271. https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoadministrativo/article/view/13694
Condorelli, E. J. L. (1986). El abuso y la mala fe dentro del proceso. Abeledo-Perrol.
de Oliveira, C. A. A. (2009). El derecho a la tutela jurisdiccional efectiva desde la perspectiva de los derechos fundamentales. Revista de Derecho (Valdivia), 22(1). https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09502009000100009
dos Santos Melgarejo, J. (2018). Ejercicio abusivo del derecho recursivo. Revista Jurídica. Investigación En Ciencias Jurídicas Y Sociales, 7, 159–176. https://ojs.ministeriopublico.gov.py/index.php/rjmp/article/view/111
Gozaíni, O. A. (1998). El abuso del proceso. Revista de Derecho Comunitario, 172.
Guerra Cerrón, J. (2018). La mutación del proceso contencioso administrativo y su efectividad en el derecho peruano. Derecho & Sociedad, 50, 37–53. https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/20373
Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación. Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta (1st ed.). Editorial Mc Graw Hill Education.
Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6ta ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Huapaya Tapia, R. (2019). El proceso contencioso administrativo [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. https://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/170699
IPE. (2021). Contribución de la Minería a la Economía Nacional (1st ed.). Sociedad Nacional de Minería, Petróleo y Energía.
Loutayf Ranea, R. (2004). Abuso procesal. Academia Nacional de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales de Córdoba. https://www.acaderc.org.ar/wp-content/blogs.dir/55/files/sites/55/2020/12/artabusoprocesal.pdf
Loutayf Ranea, R. (2015). Abuso del derecho. Jurisprudencia Argentina. http://secretarias.unc.edu.ar/acaderc/abuso-del-derecho
Mac Rae Thays, E. R. (2017). Objeto del proceso contencioso administrativo en el Perú. Advocatus, 036, 225–243. https://doi.org/10.26439/advocatus2018.n036.4754
Ministerio de Energía y Minas. (2022). MINEM busca posicionar la minería peruana a un nivel mundial. Plataforma Digital Única Del Estado Peruano. https://www.gob.pe/institucion/minem/noticias/598626-minem-busca-posicionar-la-mineria-peruana-a-un-nivel-mundial
Muñoz Aranguren, A. (2018). Abuso del derecho y ponderación de derechos. Doxa. Cuadernos de Filosofía Del Derecho, 41, 35. https://doi.org/10.14198/DOXA2018.41.02
Olivera Díaz, K. T. (2017). El abuso del derecho en la revisión judicial frente al procedimiento de cobranza coactiva [Universidad César Vallejo]. https://repositorio.ucv.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12692/15252
Palacios Pareja, E. (2016). Temeridad o Mala Fe. Código Procesal Civil Comentado. Gaceta Jurídica SA. http://www.estudiopalacios.net/inc/Temeridad o mala fe.pdf
Trigiani, A. (2017). El abuso procesal. Aequitas, 11(11). https://p3.usal.edu.ar/index.php/aequitas/article/view/5025
Vargas Guevara, E. E. (2019). El mejor remedio para un mal abogado podría ser... ¿otro abogado? IUS ET VERITAS, 58, 202–224. https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.201901.012
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Karolay Brillith Díaz-Guevara, Lionel Bardales-del-Águila, Richard Joseph Solis-Toledo, Alberto Edgardo Castillo-Neyra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain their rights:
a. The authors retain their trademark and patent rights, as well as any process or procedure described in the article.
b. The authors retain the right to share, copy, distribute, execute and publicly communicate the article published in the Ratio Iure Scientific Journal (RCRI) (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in the RCRI.
c. Authors retain the right to make a subsequent publication of their work, to use the article or any part of it (for example: a compilation of their works, notes for conferences, thesis, or for a book), provided that they indicate the source of publication (authors of the work, journal, volume, number and date).
