About the Journal

Focus and scope

The Revista Salud Amazónica y Bienestar  (RSAYB) (e-ISSN: 2810-8841) is an open access scientific journal edited by the Editorial Fund of the Universidad Nacional de San Martín, in collaboration with the faculties of Health Sciences and Human Medicine.

RSAYB is a publication of international scope that disseminates contributions in Spanish rigorously evaluated by peers, under the double-blind modality. In addition to original articles, the reader will find review articles, short communications, scientific notes, letters to the editor and editorials.

Its mission is to disseminate the knowledge produced by the academic-scientific community in the areas of Health Sciences, Basic Medicine, Clinical Medicine and related topics. The journal's objective is to publish original and unpublished articles of great relevance to society, twice a year in Spanish. Its target audience is academics, professionals and students linked to medical and health sciences.

Types of collaborations

All works published in the RSAYB must be rigorous and well-founded; not have been previously published or submitted simultaneously to an opinion in another journal.

Referred papers:

a) Original articles. Presents the results of scientific research based on theoretical or experimental hypotheses, which means an original contribution to knowledge in any of the areas of interest to the magazine. It relates the way to delimit the research question, the way to put it to the test (statistical analysis of the experiment, disciplinary protocols) and the confrontation of the data generated with the current literature.

b) Review articles. Meta-analysis and comprehensive critical evaluation of research carried out on topics within the scope of the journal. This type of work offers the state of knowledge of said object or area of ​​study, which allows identifying relationships, contradictions or inconsistencies in the topic of interest, and making proposals for further studies.

c) Short communications. Reports of unusual importance, urgency and interest and must contain relevant preliminary results. It cannot be more than four pages of the magazine (approx. 4000 words). Larger communications will be returned to authors for reduction. An explanation that justifies the publication of a communication must include its importance and interest, which will help the editor to accept or reject the communication.

Non-refereed papers:

a) Scientific notes. Presents observations and brief scientific descriptions of methods or results, progress of research work or news of scientific interest. The results must be conclusive or important to disseminate a complete phase of an ongoing investigation. It cannot be more than five pages of the magazine (approx. 5000 words). In the case of the Summary and Abstract, the length should not exceed 100 words. It is also recommended that in the bibliographic references, the essential be noted.

b) Letters to the editor. We publish works that expose objections or comments referred to recently published articles; not without first considering the right of reply on the part of the author, who may reply in a letter of similar length within a month. The editorial committee assesses the relevance of the publication of the reply.

c) Editorials. Works written by the editor, a member of the editorial committee or a guest researcher (guest editor) on orientations in the thematic domain of the magazine or of public interest of methodological or scientific theories; and/or topics of debate and academic actions of science and technology.

IMPORTANT

We do not accept opinion pieces or informal essays; works without theoretical foundation; incipient or inconclusive investigations; narrations, anecdotes or personal or institutional experiences; book summaries; papers with serious writing problems or articles unrelated to the areas of interest.

Code of Ethics

The RSAYB adheres to the code of ethics for the performance of the actors involved in the publication process of this journal (editors, editorial committee, authors and reviewers) established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), available at publicationethics.org

Indexing

The RSAYB constantly postulates and subscribes to national and international databases, portals, repositories and directories, in order to improve its impact on the scientific community within its scope, and achieve its prompt acceptance in high-impact indices. As of November 2024, the RSAYB is located at:

Evaluation systems

 

 

 

Journal's portal

LatinRev  

 


Directories and summaries

Responsibles Journalds

 

 

 

Databases and repositories

 

 

 

Identifiers

 

 

 

Post frequency

The RSAYB is published twice a year (January-June and July-December). The date established for the publication of the manuscripts, as of v1 n1, is January 20 and July 20 of each year.

Payments per publication

The RSAYB does not issue or receive payments for the submission, processing and publication of texts.

Peer review process

Contributions must favorably accredit the academic opinion process, which will operate under the peer review modality, double blind, where the identity of both the authors and the reviewers will remain anonymous:

  1. The articles that accredit the editorial opinion will be sent to expert academics in the same disciplinary and thematic area as those of the postulated text. The reviewers will be selected from the portfolio of referees –made up of specialists from national and international institutions–, who will comment on the relevance and quality of the proposed text and determine the feasibility of its publication.
  2. The reviewers will be responsible for reviewing and analyzing that the texts are an original contribution, that the theoretical references are relevant and the appropriate methodology, and assess the relevance of the findings described.
  3. All texts will be sent to two experts –attached to a different institution from that of the authors–, who will issue their comments. Ultimately, based on the reviewers' recommendations, the editor's decision will be:

    REFEREE A REFEREE B RESOLUTION
    Positive Positive Accepted
    Positive Negative Sending the article to referee C,
    whose decision will be final
    and unappealable
    Positive Conditional
    (subject to changes
    and resubmission)    		 The corrected article returns
    to the reviewer, who accepts or rejects the publication (2nd round)
    Negative Conditional
    (subject to changes
    and resubmission)    		 Rejected
    Negative Negative Rejected
  4. The editorial committee will guarantee, in all cases, that the opinions delivered to the authors contain solid arguments that support the editorial decision.
  5. The results of the academic opinion process will be final in all cases.
  6. The time for the document to be submitted for review will depend on the number of articles on the waiting list. Once the author has been notified of the receipt of the article, the estimated time for the opinion is two months.
  7. In case of receiving comments, the author will have a period of two weeks to send the new version of the work to the editor.
  8. Once the article is received, the referees will have a period of one month to carry out the review and deliver the result.
  9. Accepted documents will start the editing process (style correction, layout, metadata marking, etc.) to be published later, according to the decision of the editorial direction.
  10. Once the editorial process is complete, the preliminary version of the text will be sent to the authors for final review and approval. These will have a period of three calendar days for the delivery of the Vo.Bo., if no comments are delivered within that period, the editorial coordination of the journal will assume that the authors have given their tacit approval.
  11. Certificates of publication will only be issued to those authors who apply to the Editor of the journal.

Support

Editorial Fund, UNSM

Financing sources

Research and Development Institute, UNSM